Congress Demands UAP Video Disclosure: Lawmakers Push for Unseen UFO Evidence

For years, the public UAP story has lived in fragments.

A witness statement, a blurred clip, a hearing, a denial, a

promise of transparency followed by silence.

We've been shown enough to stay interested, but never enough to

see the full picture. And that may be the point.

Because in Washington, the fight is changing.

No longer over rumours, no longer over whether the

phenomenon deserves attention, but over something far more

dangerous to the system, the hidden archive.

Now Congress is asking a different question.

Not do UAP videos exist, but how many exist, who has them and why

haven't we seen them? This is not a story about one

object in the sky. It is a story about evidence

control and the moment lawmakers stopped asking politely.

Welcome back to UFODUAP, the disclosure report.

I'm your host, Matt Tones. Thank you for joining.

Please remember to subscribe and share our podcast.

It means the world to us. Today's episode is about a

shift, and it's titled The Hidden Videos.

Why Congress is Escalating the UAP Fight.

So the episode is not a shift in the sky, but a shift in

Washington, because for years, the public UAP story has

revolved around the same cycle. A witness speaks, A lawmaker

reacts. An office promises transparency,

and then the core evidence stays out of reach.

But in late March and early April 2026, that cycle changed

in one important way. Congress stopped speaking in

general generalities and started demanding specific video files

by name in a March 31st, 2026 letter to Defence Secretary Pete

Hegseth, House Oversight Task Force chair Anna Paulina Luna

said. Whistleblowers told the task

force that AARO possesses additional video records of

potential UAP sightings, called the lack of transparency

troubling, and said Arrow's response had been less than

adequate and requested delivery of a list of video files by

April 14, 2026. That is why this episode

matters, because this is no longer just Congress.

Once more, disclosure. This is now Congress believes

specific UO UAP videos exist, believes Arrow has them, and is

escalating pressure to get them. And once that happens, the whole

story changes. It stops being purely cultural.

It becomes procedural. It becomes evidentiary.

It becomes a fight over who controls the archive.

That is the frame for today. Not have aliens been confirmed.

Not is disclosure finally here, but something more grounded and

a more important in many ways more important.

Why is Congress now fighting over hidden UAP video?

And what does that fight tell us about the state of the evidence?

Let's begin with what is solid. On April 1st, 2026, the House

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform publicly

announced that the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal

Secrets was continuing its investigation into Uaps and the

federal government's lack of transparency.

The committee said Luna had sent a letter to Hegseth requesting a

series of video files related to UAP signings.

The underlying letter is even more revealing.

It says the task force's investigation was informed by a

September 9, 2025 hearing, and that whistleblowers inform the

task force that Arrow possesses additional video records of

potential UAP sightings. It also says the task force

views Uaps in and around US restricted airspace as a very

real threat, and that response from Arrow when questioned and

provided data had been less than adequate.

That is the first intelligence takeaway.

Congress is no longer merely asking abstract questions about

transparency. It is signalling that it

believes a specific, undisclosed video archive exists and that

the current public output from Arrow does not reflect the full

inventory. Now let's look at the list,

because the list itself may be the biggest story.

The letter requests at least 26 entries, with some entries

containing multiple sub videos. The titles include cases such As

for UAP for formation in Iran on the 26th of August 2022.

Syrian UAP instant acceleration 2021 UAPUSO formation.

Wiley 2 by Zinc cigar shaped or fat.

Spherical UAP on the 15th of October 2022.

Spherical UAP over AFG in and out of clouds on the 23rd of

November 2020. AFSOC Kabul UAP in 2017, USC

GC-144 UAP 2, Tic Tac IR Hot 24th of April 2024, Eglin Air

Force Base F18 FLIP UAPM Q-9 Observer, UAP in East China Sea

on the 5th of January 2023, and several UAP in vicinity of

Columbus O'Hara Airport. The list also includes a

reference to the Lake Huron shoot down event from February

12, 2023. That matters for several

reasons. First, the requested files are

not all one kind of case. Some are clearly military

aviation cases. Some appear to be maritime or

transmedium cases. Some are tied to foreign

theatres, including Iran, Syria, Afghanistan, the East China Sea

and Kazakhstan. Some are tied to US domestic

airspace, including Eglin and Columbus.

That suggests the archive Congress is targeting is not a

narrow collection of Internet famous incidents.

It looks more like a distributed operational archive gathered

across commands, theatres and sensor types. 2nd, the naming

conventions are revealing. Some entries sound descriptive

and almost cinematic. For example, instant

acceleration or cigar shaped or fat spherical or pulsing over

water. Others sound like internal

operational labels or call signs like Wile E2X, Zinc or Wallach

4X or Voodoo 4X or Jacka 2X, Cactus 1X or Hackney 6.

And another example is Toxic six.

That is usually what you see when records come from real

military reporting channels rather than from public

relations summaries. Third, the list reinforces

something researchers have suspected for some time.

The most interesting UAP archive may be less about 1 spectacular

case and more about a broad pattern of militarised

observation across multiple regions.

Now we need to ask the obvious question.

If these videos exist, why haven't we seen them already?

And here is where the story becomes more complicated.

Arrow has released some official UAP imagery.

It's public imagery page includes a mix of resolved and

unresolved cases, many of them from European and African

theatres, with some involving infrared footage from U.S.

military platforms. That page includes entries Arrow

says were resolved as balloons, birds or not anomalous,

alongside some unresolved entries and one 2024 European

case where Arrow says with high confidence the footage depicts

the presence of a physical object.

So Arrow is not withholding everything.

But that is exactly why Luna's letter is so important, because

it implies the public imagery page maybe only a partial public

facing slice of a much larger library.

And once Congress says whistleblowers told them Arrow

holds additional video records, the burden shifts.

The question is no longer does Arrow publish anything.

The question becomes how much of the real archive remains outside

public view. That is the second intelligence

takeaway. The transparency fight is no

longer about whether Arrow has an archive.

It is about whether the published archive is

representative of a hidden one. Now let's consider the geography

of the list, because that may be one of the most overlooked

details. The requested items span the

Middle East, Afghanistan, the East China Sea, Kazakhstan,

Europe, US coastal and domestic airspace, and at least one

apparent USO under sea related case.

That matters because it undermines the lazy assumption

that the UAP story is mainly A narrow domestic political debate

centred on a few U.S. Navy clips.

Congress is now targeting what looks like a global military

sensor problem. If even a fraction of these

cases are substantial, then the archive is describing not one

hub hotspot, but a distributed pattern of aerial anomaly

surfacing in operational theatres.

And this is where the current episode becomes especially

relevant to the broader history of UAP disclosure.

For years, the public has been given a handful of iconic clips,

Tic Tac gimbal go fast and encouraged to debate those

endlessly. But the lunar letter suggests

the real story may not be those famous public clips at all.

The real story may be the unseen middle layer.

The case is serious enough to be logged, named, preserved, and

discussed internally, but never elevated to public legend

because the files never escape the system.

That is a major point, because once you understand that the

current conflict stops looking like a fight over one or two

videos, it starts looking like a fight over curation.

Who gets to decide which cases become public symbols in which

remain buried inside metadata, internal references and close

channels? Now a responsible analysis has

to pull back here. A list of requested videos is

not proof that every case on the list is extraordinary.

In fact, Arrow's own public page shows that many apparently

mysterious infrared clips later resolved into balloons, birds or

prosaic aircraft like signatures.

Several Europe 2022 entries are explicitly listed as resolved as

a balloon, while others are unresolved but described as

having unremarkable behaviour, though insufficient data for

conclusive attribution. So we should not turn Luna's

letter into Congress has 26 alien videos.

That would be bad analysis. What the list proves is

narrower, but still significant. Congress believes these files

are important enough to demand. Congress believes Arrow has more

than it is published. Congress believes Uaps in

restricted or military airspace remain a security issue.

And that is enough to justify this episode.

Because this is how serious archive fights begin.

Not with a dramatic confession, with a records request, with a

deadline, with a mismatch between what one side says

exists and what the other side has shown.

Now let's talk about why this is escalating now.

The letter explicitly cites earlier hearings, including the

task forces, September 9th, 2025 UAP focused hearing, and a

November 13th, 2024 hearing statement from Rep Nancy Mace.

In other words, this April 2026 move is not isolated.

It appears to be the next step in an accumulating congressional

frustration. Hearing first, public pressure

second, then specific demands for the raw material itself.

That means the deepest story may be institutional.

The task force is effectively saying we have heard the

testimony. We have heard from

whistleblowers, we've asked the office questions, and now we

want the files. That is the third intelligence

takeaway. Congress appears to moving from

oversight by testimony to oversight by evidence inventory,

and that is an important difference because testimony can

be dismissed as interpretation and inventory can't.

If the videos are delivered and mostly turn out to be prosaic,

that strengthens Arrow. If they're delivered and several

are clearly stronger than what has been publicly implied, that

weakens Arrow's public posture. If they're not delivered at all,

then the story becomes not just UA PS, but congressional access

itself. Now think about the symbolic

cases embedded inside the list. There is an Eglin Air Force Base

reference. There is an F18 flip UAP

reference. Sorry, that should be flow UAP

reference. There is a Lake Huron shoot down

reference. There are USCG tic tac IR

references. There are multiple spherical UAP

entries. There are trans medium implement

implications in the USO cases. That matters because it shows

the requested requested archive isn't just one weird BLOB in

infrared. It appears to span many of the

very categories that have dominated modern UAB debate

formation. Spears, Tic tac like objects,

maritime transition cases, restricted airspace events in

cases tied to major military platforms.

That does not confirm a unified phenomenon, but it does suggest

that the hidden archive, if released, could materially

reshape the public conversation, either by normalising many of

these categories into prosaic explanations or by revealing

that the public has so far seen only the safest and least

disruptive slice of the overall record.

And that is why the the title of this episode matters.

This is not just Congress wants more files.

This is the hidden videos. Because the true conflict is

over visibility. What counts as public evidence

in the UAP era? Who decides when a military case

is ready for release? And what happens when lawmakers

publicly imply that the most important evidence is still

behind the curtain? Now let's make the cleanest

assessment we can. As of today, the strongest

evidence is that a House task force has formally requested a

large set of named UAP videos from the Defence Department.

The request was justified by whistleblower claims that Arrow

possesses additional video records.

The task force believes UA so Uaps near U.S. military airspace

pose a real security concern. Arrow already publishes some

injury imagery, including resolved and unresolved cases,

but Congress appears to believe that public output is incomplete

and a deadline of April 14, 2026 was set for delivery.

That is already enough for a serious episode, but because one

specific evidence is demanded in writing, the transparency story

becomes measurable. Either the files come or they

don't. Either the archive opens wider

or it doesn't. Either Arrows public posture is

vindicated or it isn't. And that is why this has been

one of the most consequential UAP oversight developments in

years. Not because it proves what is on

the videos, we do not know that yet, but because it transforms

the debate from belief versus disbelief into something more

concrete. Inventory access and

accountability. So the final intelligence read

is this. The real battle is no longer

whether Uaps are taken seriously inside government.

They clearly are. The real battle is over whether

the public is seeing the same archive Congress believes

exists. And if Congress is right, then

the next phase of the UAP story is not another hearing.

It is a struggle over the hidden video layer beneath the

hearings. This has been UFO to UAP the

disclosure report. I'm Matt Tones, thank you for

joining us. Remember to subscribe, share the

podcast, and don't forget to tell your mom about our episode.

Music.

Tonight's Episode